In a recent article by The Guardian, a headline emerged proclaiming, “Some ultra-processed foods are good for your health, WHO-backed study finds.” The notion that certain processed foods could be beneficial raises eyebrows and sparks curiosity, especially for health-conscious individuals. The study delves into the realm of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and their potential health impacts, but it is important to dig a bit deeper before taking such statements at face value. Read on to explore the intricacies of the study and better understand why the idea that processed foods can be advantageous is, in fact, misleading.
The Truth Behind Ultra-Processed Foods and Health
Nutrients & Processing
The article in question places emphasis on the nutrient density of certain ultra-processed foods, suggesting that processing techniques enhance bioavailability, or make it easier for your body to absorb and use those nutrients. While it is true that processing can alter the form of nutrients, it is crucial to distinguish between the nutrient density found in whole foods versus the fortified nutrients in processed options. Whole foods offer a spectrum of vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants in their natural form, providing a well-rounded approach to nutrition. In contrast, ultra-processed foods may contain synthetic additives that, while meeting nutritional requirements on paper, lack the overall benefits of unprocessed counterparts. Getting all your nutrients from natural sources when possible is recommended by nearly every reputable health resource, and for good reason, as eating processed foods does not offer all the same benefits as eating whole, unprocessed food.
Toxic Cycles of Processed Foods
The allure of ultra-processed foods often lies in their convenience and extended shelf life, but the potential health consequences are far-reaching. Emulsifiers and stabilizers, commonly added to enhance texture and increase shelf life, have been shown to break down the mucus lining in the gastrointestinal tract, negatively impacting the gut microbiome. Artificial sweeteners, touted as a low-calorie alternative, may satisfy the sweet taste craving at the moment but fail to activate receptors in the gut that signal satiety to the brain, leading to continued cravings for sweets. Additionally, the consumption of heavily refined salts, stripped of essential minerals, can create a vicious cycle by making the body crave salty foods to fulfill its mineral needs. These are just a few of many toxic cycles, perpetuated by the consumption of ultra-processed foods, raising significant concerns about both short-term and long-term effects on health and well-being.
The Study’s Conclusion
The WHO-backed study, as highlighted in the article, is observational in nature, meaning it cannot establish a cause-and-effect relationship between ultra-processed foods and comorbidities. While it can make claims, it is by no means proof that decades of research and basic nutrition principles are wrong. While it stated that people should not avoid UPFs entirely, the study itself concluded that higher consumption of ultra-processed foods was associated with a higher risk of multimorbidity of cancer and cardiometabolic diseases. The recommendation to opt for “similar but less processed foods” for the prevention of these conditions further underscores the limitations of the study. Observational studies can provide valuable insights, but their findings should be interpreted with caution, as opposed to being turned into hyperbolic headlines.
While the idea that certain ultra-processed foods can be beneficial may have garnered attention, a closer examination reveals the flaws in such assertions. Nutrient density and bioavailability, the toxic cycle triggered by ultra-processed foods, and the observational nature of the study all contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between processed foods and health. It is crucial to recognize that health and nutrition are complex subjects, requiring careful consideration of various factors. As we navigate through the sea of information, the importance of health and nutrition education becomes evident. Misleading headlines and sensational claims underscore the need for individuals to be well-informed and critical consumers of health-related information. Ultimately, seeking guidance from trusted health professionals is key to making informed decisions about our well-being.
- Mozaffarian, D., & Forouhi, N. G. (2018). Dietary guidelines and health—is nutrition science up to the task? BMJ, 360, k822. https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k822
- Hall, K. D., Ayuketah, A., Brychta, R., Cai, H., Cassimatis, T., Chen, K. Y., … & Walter, M. (2019). Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: An inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell metabolism, 30(1), 67-77. https://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(19)30474-2
- Singh, R. K., Chang, H. W., Yan, D., Lee, K. M., Ucmak, D., Wong, K., … & Liao, W. (2017). Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. Journal of translational medicine, 15(1), 73. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y
- Fardet, A. (2018). Characterization of the degree of food processing in relation to its health potential and effects. Advances in food and nutrition research, 85, 79-129. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29477138/
- Ludwig, D. S., & Hu, F. B. (2016). The importance of dietary composition in preventing obesity and chronic diseases. The American journal of medicine, 129(2), 115-128. https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(15)00800-3/fulltext